Anopina ednana
In 3 days ~10% in a week ~30%
Anopina ednana is a moth of the family Tortricidae. It is found in eastern North America, including Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, North Carolina, Ontario, Pennsylvania, Quebec, Tennessee and West Virginia. The wingspan is 11–12 mm.
It was named in honour of the scientific illustrator Edna L. Beutenmüller. Wikipedia →
| # | Park | Country | Daily sighting probability |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Acadia National Park | 🇺🇸 United States |
More parks will be added in future updates.
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report an Anopina ednana sighting in Acadia National Park on a given day, based on 7 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 304th most-seen of the 405 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 10%, and over a week to about 30%, if each day is a fresh chance.
July and August
In those months about 10% of wildlife watchers report an Anopina ednana in Acadia National Park on a given day, against under 5% in September to June, the lowest months.
Between 9 pm and midnight
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Anopina ednana sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 pm and 6 am: it is mostly seen at night.
Only Acadia National Park, in our data
Acadia National Park is the only park on Wallace's Line with enough records to rate Anopina ednana sightings: under 5% of wildlife watchers there report one on a given day.
Same family: Tortricidae
The closest relatives of the Anopina ednana that you can see in Acadia National Park (family Tortricidae, Tortricid Leafroller Moths) are Filbertworm Moth (about 10%), White Triangle Tortrix (about 10%) and Reticulated Fruitworm Moth (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Anopina ednana is recorded against all the insects logged in Acadia National Park (7 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.
