What are the chances of seeing an Azochis curvilinealis in Arenal Volcano National Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report an Azochis curvilinealis sighting in Arenal Volcano National Park on a given day, based on 5 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 256th most-seen of the 302 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 10%, and over a week to about 30%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see an Azochis curvilinealis in Arenal Volcano National Park?
February–March and May
In those months about 10% of wildlife watchers report an Azochis curvilinealis in Arenal Volcano National Park on a given day, against under 5% in April and June–January, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see an Azochis curvilinealis?
Between 7 and 10 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Azochis curvilinealis sightings with a recorded time, and about 7 in 10 of them come between 6 pm and 6 am: it is mostly seen at night.
Is Arenal Volcano National Park the best place to see an Azochis curvilinealis?
2nd of 2
Of the 2 parks where we can rate Azochis curvilinealis sightings, Arenal Volcano National Park ranks 2nd at under 5%. The best odds are in Tapantí-Macizo de la Muerte National Park (Costa Rica, about 10%).
Which relatives of the Azochis curvilinealis live in Arenal Volcano National Park?
Same family: Crambidae
The closest relatives of the Azochis curvilinealis that you can see in Arenal Volcano National Park (family Crambidae, Crambid Snout Moths) are Siga pyronia (about 10%), Midila soror (about 10%) and Mung Bean Moth (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Azochis curvilinealis sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Azochis curvilinealis is recorded against all the insects logged in Arenal Volcano National Park (5 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.