What are the chances of seeing a Munatia biolleyi in Arenal Volcano National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Munatia biolleyi sighting in Arenal Volcano National Park on a given day, based on 10 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 129th most-seen of the 302 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 20%, and over a week to about 40%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Munatia biolleyi in Arenal Volcano National Park?
March–May, July–August and December
In those months about 10% of wildlife watchers report a Munatia biolleyi in Arenal Volcano National Park on a given day, against under 5% in January–February, June and September–November, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Munatia biolleyi?
Between 9 am and noon
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Munatia biolleyi sightings with a recorded time, and about 8 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Arenal Volcano National Park the best place to see a Munatia biolleyi?
Among the best
Of the 2 parks where we can rate Munatia biolleyi sightings, Arenal Volcano National Park ranks 2nd at about 10%, level with the leaders once rounded. The best odds are in Braulio Carrillo National Park (Costa Rica, about 10%).
Which relatives of the Munatia biolleyi live in Arenal Volcano National Park?
Same family: Romaleidae
The closest relatives of the Munatia biolleyi that you can see in Arenal Volcano National Park (family Romaleidae, Lubber Grasshoppers) are Chromacris trogon (about 10%) and Costarica costaricensis (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Munatia biolleyi sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Munatia biolleyi is recorded against all the insects logged in Arenal Volcano National Park (10 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.