What are the chances of seeing a St. Lawrence Tiger Moth in Banff National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a St. Lawrence Tiger Moth sighting in Banff National Park on a given day, based on 7 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 76th most-seen of the 105 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 10%, and over a week to about 30%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a St. Lawrence Tiger Moth in Banff National Park?
June and July
In those months about 10% of wildlife watchers report a St. Lawrence Tiger Moth in Banff National Park on a given day, against under 5% in August to May, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a St. Lawrence Tiger Moth?
Between 11 am and 2 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most St. Lawrence Tiger Moth sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Banff National Park the best place to see a St. Lawrence Tiger Moth?
6th of 6
Of the 6 parks where we can rate St. Lawrence Tiger Moth sightings, Banff National Park ranks 6th at about 10%. The best odds are in Elk Island National Park (Canada, about 20%), Jasper National Park (Canada, about 10%) and Denali National Park (United States, about 10%).
Which relatives of the St. Lawrence Tiger Moth live in Banff National Park?
Same family: Erebidae
The closest relatives of the St. Lawrence Tiger Moth that you can see in Banff National Park (family Erebidae, Underwing, Tiger, Tussock, and Allied Moths) are Police Car Moth (about 20%) and Little Arches (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the St. Lawrence Tiger Moth sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the St. Lawrence Tiger Moth is recorded against all the insects logged in Banff National Park (7 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.