What are the chances of seeing an Ammoconia caecimacula in Bavarian Forest National Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report an Ammoconia caecimacula sighting in Bavarian Forest National Park on a given day, based on 5 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 964th most-seen of the 1115 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 10%, and over a week to about 30%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see an Ammoconia caecimacula in Bavarian Forest National Park?
September
In that month about 20% of wildlife watchers report an Ammoconia caecimacula in Bavarian Forest National Park on a given day, against under 5% in October to August, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see an Ammoconia caecimacula?
Between 8 and 11 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Ammoconia caecimacula sightings with a recorded time, and about 6 in 10 of them come between 6 pm and 6 am: it is seen both by day and at night.
Where else can you see an Ammoconia caecimacula?
Only Bavarian Forest National Park, in our data
Bavarian Forest National Park is the only park on Wallace's Line with enough records to rate Ammoconia caecimacula sightings: under 5% of wildlife watchers there report one on a given day.
Which relatives of the Ammoconia caecimacula live in Bavarian Forest National Park?
Same family: Noctuidae
The closest relatives of the Ammoconia caecimacula that you can see in Bavarian Forest National Park (family Noctuidae, Cutworm Moths and Allies) are Silver Υ (about 20%), Knot Grass Moth (about 20%) and Large Yellow Underwing (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Ammoconia caecimacula sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Ammoconia caecimacula is recorded against all the insects logged in Bavarian Forest National Park (5 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.