What are the chances of seeing a Lascoria laurentia in Braulio Carrillo National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Lascoria laurentia sighting in Braulio Carrillo National Park on a given day, based on 5 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 325th most-seen of the 378 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 20%, and over a week to about 30%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Lascoria laurentia in Braulio Carrillo National Park?
January–February and June
In those months about 10% of wildlife watchers report a Lascoria laurentia in Braulio Carrillo National Park on a given day, against under 5% in March–May and July–December, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Lascoria laurentia?
Between 8 and 11 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Lascoria laurentia sightings with a recorded time, and about 8 in 10 of them come between 6 pm and 6 am: it is mostly seen at night.
Where else can you see a Lascoria laurentia?
Only Braulio Carrillo National Park, in our data
Braulio Carrillo National Park is the only park on Wallace's Line with enough records to rate Lascoria laurentia sightings: about 10% of wildlife watchers there report one on a given day.
Which relatives of the Lascoria laurentia live in Braulio Carrillo National Park?
Same family: Erebidae
The closest relatives of the Lascoria laurentia that you can see in Braulio Carrillo National Park (family Erebidae, Underwing, Tiger, Tussock, and Allied Moths) are Walker's Moth (about 40%), Emeraldine (about 20%) and Black Witch (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Lascoria laurentia sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Lascoria laurentia is recorded against all the insects logged in Braulio Carrillo National Park (5 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.