What are the chances of seeing a Parathyris cedonulli in Brownsberg Nature Park?
Possible
About 30% of wildlife watchers report a Parathyris cedonulli sighting in Brownsberg Nature Park on a given day, based on 6 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 33rd most-seen of the 74 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 70%, and over a week to about 90%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Parathyris cedonulli in Brownsberg Nature Park?
March and December
In those months about 50% of wildlife watchers report a Parathyris cedonulli in Brownsberg Nature Park on a given day, against under 5% in February and April, the lowest months. September has too few records to rate.
What time of day is best to see a Parathyris cedonulli?
Between 3 and 6 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Parathyris cedonulli sightings with a recorded time, and nearly all of them come between 6 pm and 6 am: it is mostly seen at night.
Where else can you see a Parathyris cedonulli?
Only Brownsberg Nature Park, in our data
Brownsberg Nature Park is the only park on Wallace's Line with enough records to rate Parathyris cedonulli sightings: about 30% of wildlife watchers there report one on a given day.
Which relatives of the Parathyris cedonulli live in Brownsberg Nature Park?
Same family: Erebidae
The closest relatives of the Parathyris cedonulli that you can see in Brownsberg Nature Park (family Erebidae, Underwing, Tiger, Tussock, and Allied Moths) are Walker's Moth (about 40%), Prepiella radicans (about 40%) and Psychophasma erosa (about 40%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Parathyris cedonulli sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Parathyris cedonulli is recorded against all the insects logged in Brownsberg Nature Park (6 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.