Melanchroia aterea

Melanchroia aterea

Melanchroia aterea

Daily sighting probability ~10% · With luck
at Curitiba

In 3 days ~20% in a week ~40%

9 Verified sightings at Curitiba
August Best month

Global Distribution

Parks Where Found

# Park Country Daily sighting probability

More parks will be added in future updates.

Cities Where Found

# City Country Daily sighting probability
1 Curitiba 🇧🇷 Brazil
~10%
2 São Paulo 🇧🇷 Brazil
<5%
3 Buenos Aires 🇦🇷 Argentina
<5%

Before you go

What are the chances of seeing a Melanchroia aterea in Curitiba?

With luck

About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Melanchroia aterea sighting in Curitiba on a given day, based on 9 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data. It is the 105th most-seen of the 177 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 20%, and over a week to about 40%, if each day is a fresh chance.

When is the best time to see a Melanchroia aterea in Curitiba?

August

In that month about 20% of wildlife watchers report a Melanchroia aterea in Curitiba on a given day, against under 5% in January–March and September–October, the lowest months. That is one of Curitiba's driest months, with about 75 mm of rain against 220 mm in January.

Is Curitiba the best place to see a Melanchroia aterea?

Yes

Of the 3 cities where we can rate Melanchroia aterea sightings, Curitiba has the highest daily chance: about 10%. Next come São Paulo (Brazil, under 5%) and Buenos Aires (Argentina, under 5%).

Which relatives of the Melanchroia aterea live in Curitiba?

Same order: Lepidoptera

The closest relatives of the Melanchroia aterea that you can see in Curitiba (order Lepidoptera, Butterflies and Moths) are Julia Heliconian (about 30%), Red Peacock (about 30%) and Gulf Fritillary (about 30%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.

Where does the Melanchroia aterea sighting chance come from?

GBIF citizen-science records

It is estimated from how often the Melanchroia aterea is recorded against all the insects logged in Curitiba (9 verified sightings), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.

← Back to Curitiba