What are the chances of seeing a Chinese Peacock Swallowtail in Guangzhou?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Chinese Peacock Swallowtail sighting in Guangzhou on a given day, based on 69 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data. It is the 35th most-seen of the 482 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 30%, and over a week to about 50%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Chinese Peacock Swallowtail in Guangzhou?
May
In that month about 20% of wildlife watchers report a Chinese Peacock Swallowtail in Guangzhou on a given day, against under 5% in December and January, the lowest months. That is one of Guangzhou's wettest months, with about 280 mm of rain against 30 mm in December.
What time of day is best to see a Chinese Peacock Swallowtail?
Between 8 and 11 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Chinese Peacock Swallowtail sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Guangzhou the best place to see a Chinese Peacock Swallowtail?
12th of 16
Of the 16 cities where we can rate Chinese Peacock Swallowtail sightings, Guangzhou ranks 12th at about 10%. The best odds are in Changzhou (China, about 30%), Guiyang (China, about 30%) and Chongqing (China, about 30%).
Which relatives of the Chinese Peacock Swallowtail live in Guangzhou?
Same genus: Papilio
The closest relatives of the Chinese Peacock Swallowtail that you can see in Guangzhou (genus Papilio, Common Swallowtails) are Common Mormon Swallowtail (about 20%), Chinese Yellow Swallowtail (about 10%) and Paris Peacock Swallowtail (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Chinese Peacock Swallowtail sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Chinese Peacock Swallowtail is recorded against all the insects logged in Guangzhou (69 verified sightings), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.