Pterorhinus sannio
Silhouette: Sheatherius · PhyloPic
In 3 days <5%
The white-browed laughingthrush (Pterorhinus sannio) is a bird in the family Leiothrichidae. The species was first described by Robert Swinhoe in 1867. It is found in China, Hong Kong, India, Laos, Myanmar, Thailand, and Vietnam.
This species was formerly placed in the genus Garrulax but following the publication of a comprehensive molecular phylogenetic study in 2018, it was moved to the resurrected genus Pterorhinus. Image at ADW Wikipedia →
| # | Park | Country | Daily sighting probability |
|---|
More parks will be added in future updates.
| # | Zoo / Centre | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Tierpark Berlin | 🇩🇪 Germany | |
| 2 | Dalian forest zoo | 🇨🇳 China |
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a White-browed Laughingthrush sighting in Guangzhou on a given day, based on 7 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data. It is the 244th most-seen of the 266 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to under 5%, if each day is a fresh chance.
Any time of year
In every month with enough records, under 5% of wildlife watchers report a White-browed Laughingthrush in Guangzhou on a given day, so our monthly data shows no clear season.
12th of 12
Of the 12 cities where we can rate White-browed Laughingthrush sightings, Guangzhou ranks 12th at under 5%. The best odds are in Guiyang (China, about 90%), Chengdu (China, about 90%) and Chongqing (China, about 90%).
Same family: Leiothrichidae
The closest relatives of the White-browed Laughingthrush that you can see in Guangzhou (family Leiothrichidae, Laughingthrushes and Allies) are Masked Laughingthrush (about 40%), Black-throated Laughingthrush (about 20%) and Chinese Hwamei (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the White-browed Laughingthrush is recorded against all the birds logged in Guangzhou (7 verified sightings), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.
