Culladia hastiferalis

Culladia hastiferalis

Culladia hastiferalis

Daily sighting probability <5% · Rare
at Hong Kong

In 3 days ~10% in a week ~20%

8 Verified sightings at Hong Kong
February Best month

About the Culladia hastiferalis

Culladia hastiferalis is a moth in the family Crambidae. It was described by Francis Walker in 1866. It is found on Borneo, Sumatra, Java, Sulawesi, the Moluccas, New Guinea, Taiwan, the Philippines (Luzon) and Australia, where it has been recorded from Northern Territory and Queensland. Wikipedia →

Global Distribution

Parks Where Found

# Park Country Daily sighting probability

More parks will be added in future updates.

Cities Where Found

# City Country Daily sighting probability
1 Hong Kong 🇨🇳 China
<5%

Before you go

What are the chances of seeing a Culladia hastiferalis in Hong Kong?

Rare

Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Culladia hastiferalis sighting in Hong Kong on a given day, based on 8 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data. It is the 819th most-seen of the 1125 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 10%, and over a week to about 20%, if each day is a fresh chance.

When is the best time to see a Culladia hastiferalis in Hong Kong?

February

In that month about 10% of wildlife watchers report a Culladia hastiferalis in Hong Kong on a given day, against under 5% in March to January, the lowest months. That is one of Hong Kong's driest months, with about 30 mm of rain against 280 mm in June.

Where else can you see a Culladia hastiferalis?

Only Hong Kong, in our data

Hong Kong is the only city on Wallace's Line with enough records to rate Culladia hastiferalis sightings: under 5% of wildlife watchers there report one on a given day.

Where does the Culladia hastiferalis sighting chance come from?

GBIF citizen-science records

It is estimated from how often the Culladia hastiferalis is recorded against all the insects logged in Hong Kong (8 verified sightings), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.

← Back to Hong Kong