Oxyplax pallivitta

Oxyplax pallivitta

Oxyplax pallivitta

Daily sighting probability ~10% · With luck
at Hong Kong

In 3 days ~20% in a week ~30%

35 Verified sightings at Hong Kong
July Best month

Global Distribution

Parks Where Found

# Park Country Daily sighting probability

More parks will be added in future updates.

Cities Where Found

# City Country Daily sighting probability
1 Hong Kong 🇨🇳 China
~10%

Before you go

What are the chances of seeing an Oxyplax pallivitta in Hong Kong?

With luck

About 10% of wildlife watchers report an Oxyplax pallivitta sighting in Hong Kong on a given day, based on 35 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data. It is the 283rd most-seen of the 1125 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 20%, and over a week to about 30%, if each day is a fresh chance.

When is the best time to see an Oxyplax pallivitta in Hong Kong?

March–April, June–August and November

In those months about 10% of wildlife watchers report an Oxyplax pallivitta in Hong Kong on a given day, against under 5% in May, September–October and December–February, the lowest months.

Where else can you see an Oxyplax pallivitta?

Only Hong Kong, in our data

Hong Kong is the only city on Wallace's Line with enough records to rate Oxyplax pallivitta sightings: about 10% of wildlife watchers there report one on a given day.

Which relatives of the Oxyplax pallivitta live in Hong Kong?

Same family: Limacodidae

The closest relatives of the Oxyplax pallivitta that you can see in Hong Kong (family Limacodidae, Slug Caterpillar Moths) are Birthamula rufa (about 10%), Phlossa conjuncta (about 10%) and Orthocraspeda furva (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.

Where does the Oxyplax pallivitta sighting chance come from?

GBIF citizen-science records

It is estimated from how often the Oxyplax pallivitta is recorded against all the insects logged in Hong Kong (35 verified sightings), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.

← Back to Hong Kong