Neurothemis feralis

Neurothemis feralis

Neurothemis feralis

Daily sighting probability ~10% · With luck
at Jakarta

In 3 days ~30% in a week ~60%

29 Verified sightings at Jakarta
January Best month

Global Distribution

Parks Where Found

# Park Country Daily sighting probability

More parks will be added in future updates.

Cities Where Found

# City Country Daily sighting probability
1 Surabaya 🇮🇩 Indonesia
~20%
2 Jakarta 🇮🇩 Indonesia
~10%

Before you go

What are the chances of seeing a Neurothemis feralis in Jakarta?

With luck

About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Neurothemis feralis sighting in Jakarta on a given day, based on 29 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data. It is the 83rd most-seen of the 239 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 30%, and over a week to about 60%, if each day is a fresh chance.

When is the best time to see a Neurothemis feralis in Jakarta?

January

In that month about 30% of wildlife watchers report a Neurothemis feralis in Jakarta on a given day, against under 5% in February–May and August–September, the lowest months. That is one of Jakarta's wettest months, with about 340 mm of rain against 55 mm in August.

Is Jakarta the best place to see a Neurothemis feralis?

2nd of 2

Of the 2 cities where we can rate Neurothemis feralis sightings, Jakarta ranks 2nd at about 10%. The best odds are in Surabaya (Indonesia, about 20%).

Which relatives of the Neurothemis feralis live in Jakarta?

Same genus: Neurothemis

The closest relatives of the Neurothemis feralis that you can see in Jakarta (genus Neurothemis, Grasshawks) are Red Percher (about 40%) and Straight-Edge Red Parasol (about 20%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.

Where does the Neurothemis feralis sighting chance come from?

GBIF citizen-science records

It is estimated from how often the Neurothemis feralis is recorded against all the insects logged in Jakarta (29 verified sightings), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.

← Back to Jakarta