Macrodactylus mexicanus

Macrodactylus mexicanus

Macrodactylus mexicanus

Daily sighting probability <5% · Rare
at Mexico City

In 3 days ~10% in a week ~20%

18 Verified sightings at Mexico City
July Best month

Global Distribution

Parks Where Found

# Park Country Daily sighting probability

More parks will be added in future updates.

Cities Where Found

# City Country Daily sighting probability
1 Toluca 🇲🇽 México
~20%
2 Mexico City 🇲🇽 México
<5%

Before you go

What are the chances of seeing a Macrodactylus mexicanus in Mexico City?

Rare

Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Macrodactylus mexicanus sighting in Mexico City on a given day, based on 18 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data. It is the 276th most-seen of the 557 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 10%, and over a week to about 20%, if each day is a fresh chance.

When is the best time to see a Macrodactylus mexicanus in Mexico City?

July

In that month about 10% of wildlife watchers report a Macrodactylus mexicanus in Mexico City on a given day, against under 5% in August to June, the lowest months. That is one of Mexico City's wettest months, with about 150 mm of rain against 5 mm in December.

Is Mexico City the best place to see a Macrodactylus mexicanus?

2nd of 2

Of the 2 cities where we can rate Macrodactylus mexicanus sightings, Mexico City ranks 2nd at under 5%. The best odds are in Toluca (México, about 20%).

Which relatives of the Macrodactylus mexicanus live in Mexico City?

Same family: Scarabaeidae

The closest relatives of the Macrodactylus mexicanus that you can see in Mexico City (family Scarabaeidae, Scarabs) are Euphoria basalis (about 30%), Figeater Beetle (about 20%) and Aloeus Ox Beetle (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.

Where does the Macrodactylus mexicanus sighting chance come from?

GBIF citizen-science records

It is estimated from how often the Macrodactylus mexicanus is recorded against all the insects logged in Mexico City (18 verified sightings), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.

← Back to Mexico City