What are the chances of seeing a Three-Tailed Tiger Swallowtail in Monterrey?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Three-Tailed Tiger Swallowtail sighting in Monterrey on a given day, based on 8 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data. It is the 305th most-seen of the 413 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 10%, and over a week to about 20%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Three-Tailed Tiger Swallowtail in Monterrey?
March
In that month about 10% of wildlife watchers report a Three-Tailed Tiger Swallowtail in Monterrey on a given day, against under 5% in April to February, the lowest months. That is one of Monterrey's driest months, with about 30 mm of rain against 200 mm in September.
What time of day is best to see a Three-Tailed Tiger Swallowtail?
Between 10 am and 1 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Three-Tailed Tiger Swallowtail sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Where else can you see a Three-Tailed Tiger Swallowtail?
Only Monterrey, in our data
Monterrey is the only city on Wallace's Line with enough records to rate Three-Tailed Tiger Swallowtail sightings: under 5% of wildlife watchers there report one on a given day.
Which relatives of the Three-Tailed Tiger Swallowtail live in Monterrey?
Same genus: Papilio
The closest relatives of the Three-Tailed Tiger Swallowtail that you can see in Monterrey (genus Papilio, Common Swallowtails) are Western Giant Swallowtail (about 20%), Ruby-Spotted Swallowtail (about 10%) and Ornythion Swallowtail (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Three-Tailed Tiger Swallowtail sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Three-Tailed Tiger Swallowtail is recorded against all the insects logged in Monterrey (8 verified sightings), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.