Campsosternus gemma

Campsosternus gemma

Campsosternus gemma

Daily sighting probability ~10% · With luck
at Nanjing

In 3 days ~20% in a week ~40%

7 Verified sightings at Nanjing
August Best month

Global Distribution

Parks Where Found

# Park Country Daily sighting probability

More parks will be added in future updates.

Cities Where Found

# City Country Daily sighting probability
1 Nanjing 🇨🇳 China
~10%

Before you go

What are the chances of seeing a Campsosternus gemma in Nanjing?

With luck

About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Campsosternus gemma sighting in Nanjing on a given day, based on 7 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data. It is the 188th most-seen of the 272 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 20%, and over a week to about 40%, if each day is a fresh chance.

When is the best time to see a Campsosternus gemma in Nanjing?

August

In that month about 20% of wildlife watchers report a Campsosternus gemma in Nanjing on a given day, against under 5% in September to June, the lowest months. That is one of Nanjing's wettest months, with about 160 mm of rain against 40 mm in December.

Where else can you see a Campsosternus gemma?

Only Nanjing, in our data

Nanjing is the only city on Wallace's Line with enough records to rate Campsosternus gemma sightings: about 10% of wildlife watchers there report one on a given day.

Which relatives of the Campsosternus gemma live in Nanjing?

Same order: Coleoptera

The closest relatives of the Campsosternus gemma that you can see in Nanjing (order Coleoptera, Beetles) are Titan Stag Beetle (about 30%), Asian Lady Beetle (about 30%) and Hope's Stag Beetle (about 20%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.

Where does the Campsosternus gemma sighting chance come from?

GBIF citizen-science records

It is estimated from how often the Campsosternus gemma is recorded against all the insects logged in Nanjing (7 verified sightings), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.

← Back to Nanjing