Amata trigonophora
Daily sighting probability <5% · Rare
at Sydney

In 3 days ~10% in a week ~20%

7 Verified sightings at Sydney
March Best month

About the Amata trigonophora

Amata trigonophora is a moth of the subfamily Arctiinae first described by Alfred Jefferis Turner in 1898. It is found in the coastal areas of eastern Australia. Wikipedia →

Global Distribution

Parks Where Found

# Park Country Daily sighting probability

More parks will be added in future updates.

Cities Where Found

# City Country Daily sighting probability
1 Sydney 🇦🇺 Australia
<5%

Before you go

What are the chances of seeing an Amata trigonophora in Sydney?

Rare

Under 5% of wildlife watchers report an Amata trigonophora sighting in Sydney on a given day, based on 7 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data. It is the 558th most-seen of the 742 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 10%, and over a week to about 20%, if each day is a fresh chance.

When is the best time to see an Amata trigonophora in Sydney?

March

In that month about 10% of wildlife watchers report an Amata trigonophora in Sydney on a given day, against under 5% in April to February, the lowest months. That is one of Sydney's wettest months, with about 100 mm of rain against 45 mm in September.

Where else can you see an Amata trigonophora?

Only Sydney, in our data

Sydney is the only city on Wallace's Line with enough records to rate Amata trigonophora sightings: under 5% of wildlife watchers there report one on a given day.

Which relatives of the Amata trigonophora live in Sydney?

Same genus: Amata

The closest relatives of the Amata trigonophora that you can see in Sydney (genus Amata, Handmaidens) are White Antennae Wasp Moth (about 10%) and Amata aperta (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.

Where does the Amata trigonophora sighting chance come from?

GBIF citizen-science records

It is estimated from how often the Amata trigonophora is recorded against all the insects logged in Sydney (7 verified sightings), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.

← Back to Sydney