Cardiodactylus guttulus

Cardiodactylus guttulus

Cardiodactylus guttulus

Daily sighting probability ~10% · With luck
at Taipei

In 3 days ~30% in a week ~50%

112 Verified sightings at Taipei
26 In 1 park From 2019 to 2026
September Best month
☀️ Diurnal When it's spotted

Global Distribution

Parks Where Found

# Park Country Daily sighting probability
1 Taroko National Park 🇹🇼 Taiwan
~20%

More parks will be added in future updates.

Cities Where Found

# City Country Daily sighting probability
1 Naha 🇯🇵 Japan
~20%
2 Taipei 🇹🇼 Taiwan
~10%

Before you go

What are the chances of seeing a Cardiodactylus guttulus in Taipei?

With luck

About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Cardiodactylus guttulus sighting in Taipei on a given day, based on 112 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data. It is the 116th most-seen of the 765 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 30%, and over a week to about 50%, if each day is a fresh chance.

When is the best time to see a Cardiodactylus guttulus in Taipei?

August to October

In those months about 20% of wildlife watchers report a Cardiodactylus guttulus in Taipei on a given day, against under 5% in December to June, the lowest months.

What time of day is best to see a Cardiodactylus guttulus?

Between 8 and 11 am

Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Cardiodactylus guttulus sightings with a recorded time, and about 8 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.

Is Taipei the best place to see a Cardiodactylus guttulus?

2nd of 2

Of the 2 cities where we can rate Cardiodactylus guttulus sightings, Taipei ranks 2nd at about 10%. The best odds are in Naha (Japan, about 20%).

Where does the Cardiodactylus guttulus sighting chance come from?

GBIF citizen-science records

It is estimated from how often the Cardiodactylus guttulus is recorded against all the insects logged in Taipei (112 verified sightings), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.

← Back to Taipei