Dysschema sacrifica
In 3 days ~40% in a week ~70%
Dysschema sacrifica is a moth in the subfamily Arctiinae, of the family Erebidae. The species first described by Jacob Hübner in 1831. It is found in Brazil, Uruguay and Argentina. In Spanish, this moth is called the mariposa tigre, a name it shares with the butterfly Danaus chrysippus. Wikipedia →
| # | Park | Country | Daily sighting probability |
|---|
More parks will be added in future updates.
| # | City | Country | Daily sighting probability |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Rosario | 🇦🇷 Argentina | |
| 2 | Valencia | 🇻🇪 Venezuela | |
| 3 | Buenos Aires | 🇦🇷 Argentina | |
| 4 | Porto Alegre | 🇧🇷 Brazil | |
| 5 | São Paulo | 🇧🇷 Brazil |
Possible
About 20% of wildlife watchers report a Dysschema sacrifica sighting in Valencia, Venezuela on a given day, based on 5 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data. It is the 72nd most-seen of the 82 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 40%, and over a week to about 70%, if each day is a fresh chance.
July
In that month about 40% of wildlife watchers report a Dysschema sacrifica in Valencia, Venezuela on a given day, against under 5% in June, September and November–April, the lowest months. That is one of Valencia, Venezuela's wettest months, with about 110 mm of rain against 5 mm in February.
2nd of 5
Of the 5 cities where we can rate Dysschema sacrifica sightings, Valencia, Venezuela ranks 2nd at about 20%. The best odds are in Rosario (Argentina, about 30%).
Same family: Erebidae
The closest relatives of the Dysschema sacrifica that you can see in Valencia, Venezuela (family Erebidae, Underwing, Tiger, Tussock, and Allied Moths) are Black Witch (about 40%), Hieroglyphic Moth (about 20%) and Pale-Edged Selenisa (about 20%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Dysschema sacrifica is recorded against all the insects logged in Valencia, Venezuela (5 verified sightings), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.
