Eristalis cerealis

Eristalis cerealis

Eristalis cerealis

Daily sighting probability ~10% · With luck
at Wuhan

In 3 days ~40% in a week ~60%

10 Verified sightings at Wuhan
November Best month
☀️ Diurnal When it's spotted

Global Distribution

Parks Where Found

# Park Country Daily sighting probability

More parks will be added in future updates.

Cities Where Found

# City Country Daily sighting probability
1 Kathmandu 🇳🇵 Nepal
~20%
2 Kunming 🇨🇳 China
~20%
3 Wuhan 🇨🇳 China
~10%
4 Nanjing 🇨🇳 China
~10%
5 Hangzhou 🇨🇳 China
~10%
6 Seoul 🇰🇷 South Korea
~10%
7 Beijing 🇨🇳 China
<5%
8 Tokyo 🇯🇵 Japan
<5%
9 Taipei 🇹🇼 Taiwan
<5%

Before you go

What are the chances of seeing an Eristalis cerealis in Wuhan?

With luck

About 10% of wildlife watchers report an Eristalis cerealis sighting in Wuhan on a given day, based on 10 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data. It is the 25th most-seen of the 62 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 40%, and over a week to about 60%, if each day is a fresh chance.

When is the best time to see an Eristalis cerealis in Wuhan?

April and November

In those months about 30% of wildlife watchers report an Eristalis cerealis in Wuhan on a given day, against under 5% in June–October and December–February, the lowest months.

What time of day is best to see an Eristalis cerealis?

Between 9 am and noon

Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Eristalis cerealis sightings with a recorded time, and about 8 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.

Is Wuhan the best place to see an Eristalis cerealis?

3rd of 9

Of the 9 cities where we can rate Eristalis cerealis sightings, Wuhan ranks 3rd at about 10%. The best odds are in Kathmandu (Nepal, about 20%) and Kunming (China, about 20%).

Where does the Eristalis cerealis sighting chance come from?

GBIF citizen-science records

It is estimated from how often the Eristalis cerealis is recorded against all the insects logged in Wuhan (10 verified sightings), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.

← Back to Wuhan