What are the chances of seeing a Rita’s Remella in Cumbres de Monterrey National Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Rita’s Remella sighting in Cumbres de Monterrey National Park on a given day, based on 8 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 279th most-seen of the 431 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 10%, and over a week to about 30%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Rita’s Remella in Cumbres de Monterrey National Park?
April, July and November
In those months about 10% of wildlife watchers report a Rita’s Remella in Cumbres de Monterrey National Park on a given day, against under 5% in May–June, August–October and December–March, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Rita’s Remella?
Between 11 am and 2 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Rita’s Remella sightings with a recorded time, and nearly all of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Where else can you see a Rita’s Remella?
Only Cumbres de Monterrey National Park, in our data
Cumbres de Monterrey National Park is the only park on Wallace's Line with enough records to rate Rita’s Remella sightings: under 5% of wildlife watchers there report one on a given day.
Which relatives of the Rita’s Remella live in Cumbres de Monterrey National Park?
Same family: Hesperiidae
The closest relatives of the Rita’s Remella that you can see in Cumbres de Monterrey National Park (family Hesperiidae, Skippers) are Southern Sicklewing (about 20%), Chisos Banded-Skipper (about 10%) and Rainbow Skipper (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Rita’s Remella sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Rita’s Remella is recorded against all the insects logged in Cumbres de Monterrey National Park (8 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.