What are the chances of seeing an Agriacris magnifica in Farallones de Cali National Natural Park?
Possible
About 20% of wildlife watchers report an Agriacris magnifica sighting in Farallones de Cali National Natural Park on a given day, based on 17 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 7th most-seen of the 43 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 50%, and over a week to about 80%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see an Agriacris magnifica in Farallones de Cali National Natural Park?
February and August
In those months about 30% of wildlife watchers report an Agriacris magnifica in Farallones de Cali National Natural Park on a given day, against under 5% in April and September, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see an Agriacris magnifica?
Between 9 am and noon
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Agriacris magnifica sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Where else can you see an Agriacris magnifica?
Only Farallones de Cali National Natural Park, in our data
Farallones de Cali National Natural Park is the only park on Wallace's Line with enough records to rate Agriacris magnifica sightings: about 20% of wildlife watchers there report one on a given day.
Which relatives of the Agriacris magnifica live in Farallones de Cali National Natural Park?
Same family: Romaleidae
The closest relatives of the Agriacris magnifica that you can see in Farallones de Cali National Natural Park (family Romaleidae, Lubber Grasshoppers) are Chromacris psittacus (about 10%) and Maculiparia rotundata (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Agriacris magnifica sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Agriacris magnifica is recorded against all the insects logged in Farallones de Cali National Natural Park (17 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.