What are the chances of seeing an African False Tiger in iSimangaliso Wetland Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report an African False Tiger sighting in iSimangaliso Wetland Park on a given day, based on 5 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 272nd most-seen of the 316 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 10%, and over a week to about 30%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see an African False Tiger in iSimangaliso Wetland Park?
April, September and December–January
In those months about 10% of wildlife watchers report an African False Tiger in iSimangaliso Wetland Park on a given day, against under 5% in February–March, May–August and October–November, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see an African False Tiger?
Between 8 and 11 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most African False Tiger sightings with a recorded time, and nearly all of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Where else can you see an African False Tiger?
Only iSimangaliso Wetland Park, in our data
iSimangaliso Wetland Park is the only park on Wallace's Line with enough records to rate African False Tiger sightings: under 5% of wildlife watchers there report one on a given day.
Which relatives of the African False Tiger live in iSimangaliso Wetland Park?
Same order: Lepidoptera
The closest relatives of the African False Tiger that you can see in iSimangaliso Wetland Park (order Lepidoptera, Butterflies and Moths) are Dark Blue Pansy (about 30%), Dancing Amber (about 30%) and Citrus Swallowtail (about 20%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the African False Tiger sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the African False Tiger is recorded against all the insects logged in iSimangaliso Wetland Park (5 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.