What are the chances of seeing an Anicia Checkerspot in Jasper National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report an Anicia Checkerspot sighting in Jasper National Park on a given day, based on 20 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 33rd most-seen of the 88 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 30%, and over a week to about 50%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see an Anicia Checkerspot in Jasper National Park?
July
In that month about 20% of wildlife watchers report an Anicia Checkerspot in Jasper National Park on a given day, against under 5% in September to May, the lowest months. That is one of Jasper National Park's wettest months, with about 130 mm of rain against 55 mm in April.
What time of day is best to see an Anicia Checkerspot?
Between 11 am and 2 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Anicia Checkerspot sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Jasper National Park the best place to see an Anicia Checkerspot?
5th of 8
Of the 8 parks where we can rate Anicia Checkerspot sightings, Jasper National Park ranks 5th at about 10%. The best odds are in Kluane National Park (Canada, about 30%), Glacier National Park (United States, about 20%) and Banff National Park (Canada, about 10%).
Which relatives of the Anicia Checkerspot live in Jasper National Park?
Same family: Nymphalidae
The closest relatives of the Anicia Checkerspot that you can see in Jasper National Park (family Nymphalidae, Brush-footed Butterflies) are Pearl Crescent (about 30%), Red-Spotted Admiral (about 20%) and Mourning Cloak (about 20%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Anicia Checkerspot sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Anicia Checkerspot is recorded against all the insects logged in Jasper National Park (20 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.