What are the chances of seeing a Barred Flying Dragon in Kaeng Krachan National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Barred Flying Dragon sighting in Kaeng Krachan National Park on a given day, based on 10 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 36th most-seen of the 56 reptiles we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 30%, and over a week to about 50%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Barred Flying Dragon in Kaeng Krachan National Park?
April
In that month about 20% of wildlife watchers report a Barred Flying Dragon in Kaeng Krachan National Park on a given day, against under 5% in February–March, May–June and August–September, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Barred Flying Dragon?
Between 8 and 11 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Barred Flying Dragon sightings with a recorded time, and about 6 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is most active around dawn and dusk.
Is Kaeng Krachan National Park the best place to see a Barred Flying Dragon?
3rd of 3
Of the 3 parks where we can rate Barred Flying Dragon sightings, Kaeng Krachan National Park ranks 3rd at about 10%. The best odds are in Khao Luang National Park (Thailand, about 30%) and Khao Sok National Park (Thailand, about 30%).
Which relatives of the Barred Flying Dragon live in Kaeng Krachan National Park?
Same genus: Draco
The closest relatives of the Barred Flying Dragon that you can see in Kaeng Krachan National Park (genus Draco, Gliding lizards) are Blanford's Flying Lizard (about 10%) and Asian Gliding Lizard (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Barred Flying Dragon sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Barred Flying Dragon is recorded against all the reptiles logged in Kaeng Krachan National Park (10 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.