Labanda fasciata
In 3 days ~20% in a week ~40%
Labanda fasciata is a moth in the family Nolidae first described by Francis Walker in 1865. It is found in Sri Lanka. Wikipedia →
| # | Park | Country | Daily sighting probability |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Kaeng Krachan National Park | 🇹🇭 Thailand |
More parks will be added in future updates.
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Labanda fasciata sighting in Kaeng Krachan National Park on a given day, based on 7 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 219th most-seen of the 296 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 20%, and over a week to about 40%, if each day is a fresh chance.
July
In that month about 20% of wildlife watchers report a Labanda fasciata in Kaeng Krachan National Park on a given day, against under 5% in April, June and August–February, the lowest months. That is one of Kaeng Krachan National Park's wettest months, with about 230 mm of rain against 30 mm in December.
Between 6 and 9 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Labanda fasciata sightings with a recorded time, and about 6 in 10 of them come between 6 pm and 6 am: it is most active around dawn and dusk.
Only Kaeng Krachan National Park, in our data
Kaeng Krachan National Park is the only park on Wallace's Line with enough records to rate Labanda fasciata sightings: about 10% of wildlife watchers there report one on a given day.
Same family: Nolidae
The closest relatives of the Labanda fasciata that you can see in Kaeng Krachan National Park (family Nolidae, Tufted Moths) are Paracrama dulcissima (about 10%), Urbona leucophaea (about 10%) and Maceda mansueta (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Labanda fasciata is recorded against all the insects logged in Kaeng Krachan National Park (7 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.
