What are the chances of seeing a Malayan Slit-faced Bat in Kaeng Krachan National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Malayan Slit-faced Bat sighting in Kaeng Krachan National Park on a given day, based on 6 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 26th most-seen of the 32 mammals we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 20%, and over a week to about 40%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Malayan Slit-faced Bat in Kaeng Krachan National Park?
November
In that month about 20% of wildlife watchers report a Malayan Slit-faced Bat in Kaeng Krachan National Park on a given day, against under 5% in February and April–October, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Malayan Slit-faced Bat?
Between 9 am and noon
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Malayan Slit-faced Bat sightings with a recorded time, and nearly all of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Where else can you see a Malayan Slit-faced Bat?
Only Kaeng Krachan National Park, in our data
Kaeng Krachan National Park is the only park on Wallace's Line with enough records to rate Malayan Slit-faced Bat sightings: about 10% of wildlife watchers there report one on a given day.
Which relatives of the Malayan Slit-faced Bat live in Kaeng Krachan National Park?
Same order: Chiroptera
The closest relatives of the Malayan Slit-faced Bat that you can see in Kaeng Krachan National Park (order Chiroptera, Bats) are Hardwicke's woolly bat (about 10%), Lesser false vampire bat (about 10%) and Woolly Horseshoe Bat (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Malayan Slit-faced Bat sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Malayan Slit-faced Bat is recorded against all the mammals logged in Kaeng Krachan National Park (6 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.