What are the chances of seeing a Coeliccia didyma in Khao Yai National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Coeliccia didyma sighting in Khao Yai National Park on a given day, based on 5 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 183rd most-seen of the 221 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 20%, and over a week to about 40%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Coeliccia didyma in Khao Yai National Park?
May and September–October
In those months about 20% of wildlife watchers report a Coeliccia didyma in Khao Yai National Park on a given day, against under 5% in June, August and November–March, the lowest months. Those are among Khao Yai National Park's wettest months, with about 240 mm of rain a month against 15 mm in December.
What time of day is best to see a Coeliccia didyma?
Between 11 am and 2 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Coeliccia didyma sightings with a recorded time, and nearly all of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Khao Yai National Park the best place to see a Coeliccia didyma?
4th of 4
Of the 4 parks where we can rate Coeliccia didyma sightings, Khao Yai National Park ranks 4th at about 10%. The best odds are in Khao Luang National Park (Thailand, about 30%), Kaeng Krachan National Park (Thailand, about 20%) and Khao Sok National Park (Thailand, about 10%).
Which relatives of the Coeliccia didyma live in Khao Yai National Park?
Same genus: Coeliccia
The closest relatives of the Coeliccia didyma that you can see in Khao Yai National Park (genus Coeliccia) are Coeliccia poungyi (about 20%) and Coeliccia kazukoae (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Coeliccia didyma sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Coeliccia didyma is recorded against all the insects logged in Khao Yai National Park (5 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.