What are the chances of seeing an Anoplognathus suturalis in Kosciuszko National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report an Anoplognathus suturalis sighting in Kosciuszko National Park on a given day, based on 5 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 85th most-seen of the 105 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 20%, and over a week to about 50%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see an Anoplognathus suturalis in Kosciuszko National Park?
January
In that month about 30% of wildlife watchers report an Anoplognathus suturalis in Kosciuszko National Park on a given day, against under 5% in February to December, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see an Anoplognathus suturalis?
Between 2 and 5 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Anoplognathus suturalis sightings with a recorded time, and about 8 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Where else can you see an Anoplognathus suturalis?
Only Kosciuszko National Park, in our data
Kosciuszko National Park is the only park on Wallace's Line with enough records to rate Anoplognathus suturalis sightings: about 10% of wildlife watchers there report one on a given day.
Which relatives of the Anoplognathus suturalis live in Kosciuszko National Park?
Same order: Coleoptera
The closest relatives of the Anoplognathus suturalis that you can see in Kosciuszko National Park (order Coleoptera, Beetles) are Small Transverse Ladybird Beetle (about 20%), Variegated Lady Beetle (about 20%) and Botany Bay Diamond Weevil (about 20%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Anoplognathus suturalis sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Anoplognathus suturalis is recorded against all the insects logged in Kosciuszko National Park (5 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.