What are the chances of seeing an Inconspicuous Thornyvalve in Kruger National Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report an Inconspicuous Thornyvalve sighting in Kruger National Park on a given day, based on 7 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 588th most-seen of the 748 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 10%, and over a week to about 20%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see an Inconspicuous Thornyvalve in Kruger National Park?
May
In that month about 10% of wildlife watchers report an Inconspicuous Thornyvalve in Kruger National Park on a given day, against under 5% in June to April, the lowest months. That is one of Kruger National Park's driest months, with about 10 mm of rain against 110 mm in February.
What time of day is best to see an Inconspicuous Thornyvalve?
Between 3 and 6 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Inconspicuous Thornyvalve sightings with a recorded time, and about 7 in 10 of them come between 6 pm and 6 am: it is mostly seen at night.
Where else can you see an Inconspicuous Thornyvalve?
Only Kruger National Park, in our data
Kruger National Park is the only park on Wallace's Line with enough records to rate Inconspicuous Thornyvalve sightings: under 5% of wildlife watchers there report one on a given day.
Which relatives of the Inconspicuous Thornyvalve live in Kruger National Park?
Same family: Geometridae
The closest relatives of the Inconspicuous Thornyvalve that you can see in Kruger National Park (family Geometridae, Geometer Moths) are Vestal (about 10%), Whiterim Chlorissa (about 10%) and Pale Dusty Brindle (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Inconspicuous Thornyvalve sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Inconspicuous Thornyvalve is recorded against all the insects logged in Kruger National Park (7 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.