Isocentris charopalis
In 3 days ~10% in a week ~30%
Isocentris charopalis is a moth in the family Crambidae. It was described by Charles Swinhoe in 1907. It is found in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, South Africa, Zimbabwe and the Australian state of Queensland. Wikipedia →
| # | Park | Country | Daily sighting probability |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Kruger National Park | 🇿🇦 South Africa |
More parks will be added in future updates.
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report an Isocentris charopalis sighting in Kruger National Park on a given day, based on 9 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 430th most-seen of the 748 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 10%, and over a week to about 30%, if each day is a fresh chance.
January, March and May
In those months about 10% of wildlife watchers report an Isocentris charopalis in Kruger National Park on a given day, against under 5% in February, April and June–December, the lowest months.
Between 8 and 11 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Isocentris charopalis sightings with a recorded time, and about 7 in 10 of them come between 6 pm and 6 am: it is seen both by day and at night.
Only Kruger National Park, in our data
Kruger National Park is the only park on Wallace's Line with enough records to rate Isocentris charopalis sightings: under 5% of wildlife watchers there report one on a given day.
Same family: Crambidae
The closest relatives of the Isocentris charopalis that you can see in Kruger National Park (family Crambidae, Crambid Snout Moths) are Jasmine Moth (about 10%), Hawaiian Beet Webworm Moth (about 10%) and Measured Pearl (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Isocentris charopalis is recorded against all the insects logged in Kruger National Park (9 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.
