What are the chances of seeing a Protolychnis maculata in Kruger National Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Protolychnis maculata sighting in Kruger National Park on a given day, based on 5 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 656th most-seen of the 748 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 10%, and over a week to about 20%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Protolychnis maculata in Kruger National Park?
January and April
In those months about 10% of wildlife watchers report a Protolychnis maculata in Kruger National Park on a given day, against under 5% in February–March and May–December, the lowest months. Those are among Kruger National Park's wettest months, with about 60 mm of rain a month against almost none in August.
What time of day is best to see a Protolychnis maculata?
Between 7 and 10 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Protolychnis maculata sightings with a recorded time, and about 6 in 10 of them come between 6 pm and 6 am: it is most active around dawn and dusk.
Where else can you see a Protolychnis maculata?
Only Kruger National Park, in our data
Kruger National Park is the only park on Wallace's Line with enough records to rate Protolychnis maculata sightings: under 5% of wildlife watchers there report one on a given day.
Which relatives of the Protolychnis maculata live in Kruger National Park?
Same order: Lepidoptera
The closest relatives of the Protolychnis maculata that you can see in Kruger National Park (order Lepidoptera, Butterflies and Moths) are Dancing Amber (about 20%), African Caper (about 20%) and Plain Tiger Butterfly (about 20%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Protolychnis maculata sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Protolychnis maculata is recorded against all the insects logged in Kruger National Park (5 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.