What are the chances of seeing a Reticulate Bagnest in Kruger National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Reticulate Bagnest sighting in Kruger National Park on a given day, based on 33 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 123rd most-seen of the 748 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 20%, and over a week to about 40%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Reticulate Bagnest in Kruger National Park?
January and February
In those months about 20% of wildlife watchers report a Reticulate Bagnest in Kruger National Park on a given day, against under 5% in April to December, the lowest months. Those are among Kruger National Park's wettest months, with about 100 mm of rain a month against almost none in August.
What time of day is best to see a Reticulate Bagnest?
Between 7 and 10 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Reticulate Bagnest sightings with a recorded time, and about 6 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is most active around dawn and dusk.
Is Kruger National Park the best place to see a Reticulate Bagnest?
Among the best
Of the 2 parks where we can rate Reticulate Bagnest sightings, Kruger National Park ranks 2nd at about 10%, level with the leaders once rounded. The best odds are in iSimangaliso Wetland Park (South Africa, about 10%).
Which relatives of the Reticulate Bagnest live in Kruger National Park?
Same family: Notodontidae
The closest relatives of the Reticulate Bagnest that you can see in Kruger National Park (family Notodontidae, Prominent Moths) are Antheua tricolor (about 10%) and Desmeocraera basalis (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Reticulate Bagnest sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Reticulate Bagnest is recorded against all the insects logged in Kruger National Park (33 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.