Chlanidophora patagiata
In 3 days ~30% in a week ~60%
Chlanidophora patagiata is a moth of the family Noctuidae first described by Carlos Berg in 1877. It is found in Patagonia; it was historically misclassified, but in 2010 was determined to belong to the subfamily Agaristinae. Wikipedia →
| # | Park | Country | Daily sighting probability |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Nahuel Huapi National Park | 🇦🇷 Argentina |
More parks will be added in future updates.
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Chlanidophora patagiata sighting in Nahuel Huapi National Park on a given day, based on 6 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 29th most-seen of the 39 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 30%, and over a week to about 60%, if each day is a fresh chance.
November
In that month about 30% of wildlife watchers report a Chlanidophora patagiata in Nahuel Huapi National Park on a given day, against under 5% in January to October, the lowest months.
Between 2 and 5 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Chlanidophora patagiata sightings with a recorded time, and about 7 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is seen both by day and at night.
Only Nahuel Huapi National Park, in our data
Nahuel Huapi National Park is the only park on Wallace's Line with enough records to rate Chlanidophora patagiata sightings: about 10% of wildlife watchers there report one on a given day.
Same order: Lepidoptera
The closest relatives of the Chlanidophora patagiata that you can see in Nahuel Huapi National Park (order Lepidoptera, Butterflies and Moths) are Colias vauthierii (about 20%), Fasciolata Skipper (about 10%) and Subtropical Lady (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Chlanidophora patagiata is recorded against all the insects logged in Nahuel Huapi National Park (6 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.
