What are the chances of seeing a Cyanallagma interruptum in Nahuel Huapi National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Cyanallagma interruptum sighting in Nahuel Huapi National Park on a given day, based on 8 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 29th most-seen of the 39 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 30%, and over a week to about 60%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Cyanallagma interruptum in Nahuel Huapi National Park?
December and January
In those months about 20% of wildlife watchers report a Cyanallagma interruptum in Nahuel Huapi National Park on a given day, against under 5% in March to October, the lowest months. Those are among Nahuel Huapi National Park's driest months, with about 70 mm of rain a month against 310 mm in June.
What time of day is best to see a Cyanallagma interruptum?
Between 4 and 7 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Cyanallagma interruptum sightings with a recorded time, and about 8 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Where else can you see a Cyanallagma interruptum?
Only Nahuel Huapi National Park, in our data
Nahuel Huapi National Park is the only park on Wallace's Line with enough records to rate Cyanallagma interruptum sightings: about 10% of wildlife watchers there report one on a given day.
Which relatives of the Cyanallagma interruptum live in Nahuel Huapi National Park?
Same order: Odonata
The closest relatives of the Cyanallagma interruptum that you can see in Nahuel Huapi National Park (order Odonata, Dragonflies and Damselflies) are Rialla villosa (about 20%) and Rhionaeschna diffinis (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Cyanallagma interruptum sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Cyanallagma interruptum is recorded against all the insects logged in Nahuel Huapi National Park (8 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.