What are the chances of seeing a Stone Partridge in Niokolo-Koba National Park?
Possible
About 30% of wildlife watchers report a Stone Partridge sighting in Niokolo-Koba National Park on a given day, based on 96 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 81st most-seen of the 215 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 60%, and over a week to about 90%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Stone Partridge in Niokolo-Koba National Park?
September
In that month about 50% of wildlife watchers report a Stone Partridge in Niokolo-Koba National Park on a given day, against about 10% in April, the lowest month. That is one of Niokolo-Koba National Park's wettest months, with about 230 mm of rain against almost none in January. May–July and October have too few records to rate.
What time of day is best to see a Stone Partridge?
Between 5 and 8 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Stone Partridge sightings with a recorded time, and about 7 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is most active around dawn and dusk.
Is Niokolo-Koba National Park the best place to see a Stone Partridge?
Yes
Of the 2 parks where we can rate Stone Partridge sightings, Niokolo-Koba National Park has the highest daily chance: about 30%. Next come Kidepo Valley National Park (Uganda, about 20%).
Which relatives of the Stone Partridge live in Niokolo-Koba National Park?
Same order: Galliformes
The closest relatives of the Stone Partridge that you can see in Niokolo-Koba National Park (order Galliformes, Landfowl) are Double-spurred Francolin (about 60%) and Helmeted Guineafowl (about 50%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Stone Partridge sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Stone Partridge is recorded against all the birds logged in Niokolo-Koba National Park (96 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.