Euphyciodes albotessulalis
In 3 days ~50% in a week ~80%
Euphyciodes albotessulalis is a moth in the family Crambidae. It was described by Paul Mabille in 1900. It is found on the Comoros and in Madagascar. Wikipedia →
| # | Park | Country | Daily sighting probability |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ranomafana National Park | 🇲🇬 Madagascar |
More parks will be added in future updates.
Possible
About 20% of wildlife watchers report a Euphyciodes albotessulalis sighting in Ranomafana National Park on a given day, based on 6 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 44th most-seen of the 68 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 50%, and over a week to about 80%, if each day is a fresh chance.
July, October and December
In those months about 30% of wildlife watchers report a Euphyciodes albotessulalis in Ranomafana National Park on a given day, against under 5% in January–June and August–September, the lowest months.
Between 8 and 11 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Euphyciodes albotessulalis sightings with a recorded time, and about 7 in 10 of them come between 6 pm and 6 am: it is seen both by day and at night.
Only Ranomafana National Park, in our data
Ranomafana National Park is the only park on Wallace's Line with enough records to rate Euphyciodes albotessulalis sightings: about 20% of wildlife watchers there report one on a given day.
Same family: Crambidae
The closest relatives of the Euphyciodes albotessulalis that you can see in Ranomafana National Park (family Crambidae, Crambid Snout Moths) are Orphnophanes ankarampotsyalis (about 30%), Mung Bean Moth (about 20%) and Glyphodes toulgoetalis (about 20%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Euphyciodes albotessulalis is recorded against all the insects logged in Ranomafana National Park (6 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.
