What are the chances of seeing a Chinese Peacock Swallowtail in Taroko National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Chinese Peacock Swallowtail sighting in Taroko National Park on a given day, based on 20 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 119th most-seen of the 447 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 40%, and over a week to about 60%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Chinese Peacock Swallowtail in Taroko National Park?
November
In that month about 30% of wildlife watchers report a Chinese Peacock Swallowtail in Taroko National Park on a given day, against under 5% in April–May, September and December–January, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Chinese Peacock Swallowtail?
Between 8 and 11 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Chinese Peacock Swallowtail sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Where else can you see a Chinese Peacock Swallowtail?
Only Taroko National Park, in our data
Taroko National Park is the only park on Wallace's Line with enough records to rate Chinese Peacock Swallowtail sightings: about 10% of wildlife watchers there report one on a given day.
Which relatives of the Chinese Peacock Swallowtail live in Taroko National Park?
Same genus: Papilio
The closest relatives of the Chinese Peacock Swallowtail that you can see in Taroko National Park (genus Papilio, Common Swallowtails) are Common Mormon Swallowtail (about 20%), Spangle Swallowtail (about 20%) and Great Mormon Swallowtail (about 20%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Chinese Peacock Swallowtail sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Chinese Peacock Swallowtail is recorded against all the insects logged in Taroko National Park (20 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.