Krananda semihyalina
In 3 days ~20% in a week ~40%
Krananda semihyalina is a moth of the family Geometridae first described by Frederic Moore in 1868. It is found from the Oriental tropics to Japan, Sulawesi and the southern Moluccas. The wingspan is 39–44 mm. Wikipedia →
| # | Park | Country | Daily sighting probability |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Khao Yai National Park | 🇹🇭 Thailand | |
| 2 | Taroko National Park | 🇹🇼 Taiwan |
| # | City | Country | Daily sighting probability |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Singapore | 🇸🇬 Singapore |
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Krananda semihyalina sighting in Taroko National Park on a given day, based on 6 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 379th most-seen of the 447 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 20%, and over a week to about 40%, if each day is a fresh chance.
January–March and May–June
In those months about 10% of wildlife watchers report a Krananda semihyalina in Taroko National Park on a given day, against under 5% in April and July–December, the lowest months.
Between 7 and 10 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Krananda semihyalina sightings with a recorded time, and about half of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is seen both by day and at night.
Among the best
Of the 2 parks where we can rate Krananda semihyalina sightings, Taroko National Park ranks 2nd at about 10%, level with the leaders once rounded. The best odds are in Khao Yai National Park (Thailand, about 10%).
Same family: Geometridae
The closest relatives of the Krananda semihyalina that you can see in Taroko National Park (family Geometridae, Geometer Moths) are Biston perclara (about 10%), Agathia laetata (about 10%) and Comostola laesaria (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Krananda semihyalina is recorded against all the insects logged in Taroko National Park (6 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.
