Evacanthus interruptus
In 3 days ~40% in a week ~70%
| # | Park | Country | Daily sighting probability |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Tatra National Park | 🇸🇰 Slovakia | |
| 2 | Vanoise National Park | 🇫🇷 France | |
| 3 | Hohe Tauern National Park | 🇦🇹 Austria | |
| 4 | Triglav National Park | 🇸🇮 Slovenia |
| # | City | Country | Daily sighting probability |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Helsinki | 🇫🇮 Finland | |
| 2 | Birmingham | 🇬🇧 United Kingdom | |
| 3 | Moscow | 🇷🇺 Russia |
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report an Evacanthus interruptus sighting in Tatra National Park on a given day, based on 12 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 58th most-seen of the 142 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 40%, and over a week to about 70%, if each day is a fresh chance.
August
In that month about 30% of wildlife watchers report an Evacanthus interruptus in Tatra National Park on a given day, against under 5% in October to June, the lowest months.
Between 8 and 11 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Evacanthus interruptus sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Yes
Of the 4 parks where we can rate Evacanthus interruptus sightings, Tatra National Park has the highest daily chance: about 10%. Next come Vanoise National Park (France, about 10%) and Hohe Tauern National Park (Austria, about 10%).
Same order: Hemiptera
The closest relatives of the Evacanthus interruptus that you can see in Tatra National Park (order Hemiptera, True Bugs, Hoppers, Aphids, and allies) are Common Froghopper (about 30%), Green Shield Bug (about 20%) and Forest Bug (about 20%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Evacanthus interruptus is recorded against all the insects logged in Tatra National Park (12 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.
