Azuragrion kauderni
In 3 days ~70% in a week ~90%
| # | Park | Country | Daily sighting probability |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ankarafantsika National Park | 🇲🇬 Madagascar |
More parks will be added in future updates.
| # | City | Country | Daily sighting probability |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Antananarivo | 🇲🇬 Madagascar |
Possible
About 30% of wildlife watchers report a Malagasy Bluet sighting in Ankarafantsika National Park on a given day, based on 16 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 16th most-seen of the 31 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 70%, and over a week to about 90%, if each day is a fresh chance.
September
In that month about 70% of wildlife watchers report a Malagasy Bluet in Ankarafantsika National Park on a given day, against about 10% in April–August and December–January, the lowest months. That is one of Ankarafantsika National Park's driest months, with almost no rain against 560 mm in January. February and March have too few records to rate.
Between 8 and 11 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Malagasy Bluet sightings with a recorded time, and about 7 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is seen both by day and at night.
Only Ankarafantsika National Park, in our data
Ankarafantsika National Park is the only park on Wallace's Line with enough records to rate Malagasy Bluet sightings: about 30% of wildlife watchers there report one on a given day.
Same family: Coenagrionidae
The closest relatives of the Malagasy Bluet that you can see in Ankarafantsika National Park (family Coenagrionidae, Narrow-winged Damselflies) are Bright Sprite (about 30%) and Common Citril (about 30%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Malagasy Bluet is recorded against all the insects logged in Ankarafantsika National Park (16 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.
