Chlorida cincta
In 3 days ~10% in a week ~30%
Chlorida cincta is a species of beetle in the family Cerambycidae. It was described by Félix Édouard Guérin-Méneville in 1844. Wikipedia →
| # | Park | Country | Daily sighting probability |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Monteverde Cloud Forest Reserve | 🇨🇷 Costa Rica | |
| 2 | Arenal Volcano National Park | 🇨🇷 Costa Rica |
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Chlorida cincta sighting in Arenal Volcano National Park on a given day, based on 6 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 222nd most-seen of the 302 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 10%, and over a week to about 30%, if each day is a fresh chance.
February and March
In those months about 10% of wildlife watchers report a Chlorida cincta in Arenal Volcano National Park on a given day, against under 5% in April to January, the lowest months. Those are among Arenal Volcano National Park's driest months, with about 200 mm of rain a month against 500 mm in November.
Between 7 and 10 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Chlorida cincta sightings with a recorded time, and about 8 in 10 of them come between 6 pm and 6 am: it is mostly seen at night.
2nd of 2
Of the 2 parks where we can rate Chlorida cincta sightings, Arenal Volcano National Park ranks 2nd at about 10%. The best odds are in Monteverde Cloud Forest Reserve (Costa Rica, about 20%).
Same family: Cerambycidae
The closest relatives of the Chlorida cincta that you can see in Arenal Volcano National Park (family Cerambycidae, Longhorn Beetles) are Taeniotes scalatus (about 10%), Oedudes bifasciatus (about 10%) and Harlequin Beetle (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Chlorida cincta is recorded against all the insects logged in Arenal Volcano National Park (6 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.
