What are the chances of seeing a Rufous-browed Tyrannulet in Arenal Volcano National Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Rufous-browed Tyrannulet sighting in Arenal Volcano National Park on a given day, based on 127 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 351st most-seen of the 503 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to under 5%, and over a week to about 10%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Rufous-browed Tyrannulet in Arenal Volcano National Park?
Any time of year
In every month with enough records, under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Rufous-browed Tyrannulet in Arenal Volcano National Park on a given day, so our monthly data shows no clear season.
What time of day is best to see a Rufous-browed Tyrannulet?
Between 8 and 11 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Rufous-browed Tyrannulet sightings with a recorded time, and nearly all of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Arenal Volcano National Park the best place to see a Rufous-browed Tyrannulet?
Among the best
Of the 4 parks where we can rate Rufous-browed Tyrannulet sightings, Arenal Volcano National Park ranks 2nd at under 5%, level with the leaders once rounded. The best odds are in Tapantí-Macizo de la Muerte National Park (Costa Rica, under 5%).
Which relatives of the Rufous-browed Tyrannulet live in Arenal Volcano National Park?
Same family: Tyrannidae
The closest relatives of the Rufous-browed Tyrannulet that you can see in Arenal Volcano National Park (family Tyrannidae, Tyrant Flycatchers) are Great Kiskadee (about 70%), Social Flycatcher (about 50%) and Tropical Kingbird (about 50%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Rufous-browed Tyrannulet sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Rufous-browed Tyrannulet is recorded against all the birds logged in Arenal Volcano National Park (127 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.