What are the chances of seeing an Acmaeodera quadrivittatoides in Big Bend National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report an Acmaeodera quadrivittatoides sighting in Big Bend National Park on a given day, based on 10 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 169th most-seen of the 329 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 20%, and over a week to about 40%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see an Acmaeodera quadrivittatoides in Big Bend National Park?
July
In that month about 20% of wildlife watchers report an Acmaeodera quadrivittatoides in Big Bend National Park on a given day, against under 5% in August to March, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see an Acmaeodera quadrivittatoides?
Between 10 am and 1 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Acmaeodera quadrivittatoides sightings with a recorded time, and nearly all of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Big Bend National Park the best place to see an Acmaeodera quadrivittatoides?
Yes
Of the 2 parks where we can rate Acmaeodera quadrivittatoides sightings, Big Bend National Park has the highest daily chance: about 10%. Next come Saguaro National Park (United States, under 5%).
Which relatives of the Acmaeodera quadrivittatoides live in Big Bend National Park?
Same genus: Acmaeodera
The closest relatives of the Acmaeodera quadrivittatoides that you can see in Big Bend National Park (genus Acmaeodera) are Acmaeodera opacula (about 10%), Acmaeodera mixta (about 10%) and Acmaeodera maculifera (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Acmaeodera quadrivittatoides sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Acmaeodera quadrivittatoides is recorded against all the insects logged in Big Bend National Park (10 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.