Ozarba nebula
In 3 days ~30% in a week ~60%
Ozarba nebula is a species of moth in the family Noctuidae (the owlet moths). It was first described by William Barnes and James Halliday McDunnough in 1918 and it is found in North America. The MONA or Hodges number for Ozarba nebula is 9033. Wikipedia →
| # | Park | Country | Daily sighting probability |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Big Cypress National Preserve | 🇺🇸 United States | |
| 2 | Everglades National Park | 🇺🇸 United States |
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Nebula Brown sighting in Big Cypress National Preserve on a given day, based on 16 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 101st most-seen of the 262 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 30%, and over a week to about 60%, if each day is a fresh chance.
April–June, August and December
In those months about 20% of wildlife watchers report a Nebula Brown in Big Cypress National Preserve on a given day, against under 5% in January–March, July and September–November, the lowest months.
Between 8 and 11 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Nebula Brown sightings with a recorded time, and nearly all of them come between 6 pm and 6 am: it is mostly seen at night.
Yes
Of the 2 parks where we can rate Nebula Brown sightings, Big Cypress National Preserve has the highest daily chance: about 10%. Next come Everglades National Park (United States, under 5%).
Same family: Noctuidae
The closest relatives of the Nebula Brown that you can see in Big Cypress National Preserve (family Noctuidae, Cutworm Moths and Allies) are Spanish Moth (about 20%), Abablemma brimleyana (about 10%) and Florida Fern Moth (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Nebula Brown is recorded against all the insects logged in Big Cypress National Preserve (16 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.
