Antipterna trilicella
In 3 days ~10% in a week ~30%
Antipterna trilicella is a species of moth in the family Oecophoridae, first described by Edward Meyrick in 1885 as Ocystola trilicella. It appears to be a moth endemic to Australia and confined to the east coast, occurring in Victoria, New South Wales and Queensland. Wikipedia →
| # | Park | Country | Daily sighting probability |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blue Mountains National Park | 🇦🇺 Australia |
More parks will be added in future updates.
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report an Antipterna trilicella sighting in Blue Mountains National Park on a given day, based on 7 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 554th most-seen of the 789 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 10%, and over a week to about 30%, if each day is a fresh chance.
February and December
In those months about 10% of wildlife watchers report an Antipterna trilicella in Blue Mountains National Park on a given day, against under 5% in January and March–November, the lowest months.
Between 9 am and noon
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Antipterna trilicella sightings with a recorded time, and nearly all of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Only Blue Mountains National Park, in our data
Blue Mountains National Park is the only park on Wallace's Line with enough records to rate Antipterna trilicella sightings: under 5% of wildlife watchers there report one on a given day.
Same family: Oecophoridae
The closest relatives of the Antipterna trilicella that you can see in Blue Mountains National Park (family Oecophoridae, Concealer Moths) are Tortricopsis pyroptis (about 10%), Philobota protecta (about 10%) and Hoplostega ochroma (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Antipterna trilicella is recorded against all the insects logged in Blue Mountains National Park (7 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.
