What are the chances of seeing an Artigisa impropria in Blue Mountains National Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report an Artigisa impropria sighting in Blue Mountains National Park on a given day, based on 6 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 611th most-seen of the 789 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 10%, and over a week to about 30%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see an Artigisa impropria in Blue Mountains National Park?
February and November
In those months about 10% of wildlife watchers report an Artigisa impropria in Blue Mountains National Park on a given day, against under 5% in March–October and December–January, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see an Artigisa impropria?
Between 6 and 9 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Artigisa impropria sightings with a recorded time, and about 8 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Where else can you see an Artigisa impropria?
Only Blue Mountains National Park, in our data
Blue Mountains National Park is the only park on Wallace's Line with enough records to rate Artigisa impropria sightings: under 5% of wildlife watchers there report one on a given day.
Which relatives of the Artigisa impropria live in Blue Mountains National Park?
Same family: Erebidae
The closest relatives of the Artigisa impropria that you can see in Blue Mountains National Park (family Erebidae, Underwing, Tiger, Tussock, and Allied Moths) are Light Ermine Moth (about 10%), Bird Dropping Lichen Moth (about 10%) and Tigrioides alterna (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Artigisa impropria sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Artigisa impropria is recorded against all the insects logged in Blue Mountains National Park (6 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.