What are the chances of seeing a Lysimelia lenis in Blue Mountains National Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Lysimelia lenis sighting in Blue Mountains National Park on a given day, based on 5 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 681st most-seen of the 789 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 10%, and over a week to about 20%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Lysimelia lenis in Blue Mountains National Park?
February and March
In those months about 10% of wildlife watchers report a Lysimelia lenis in Blue Mountains National Park on a given day, against under 5% in April to January, the lowest months. Those are among Blue Mountains National Park's wettest months, with about 140 mm of rain a month against 40 mm in May.
What time of day is best to see a Lysimelia lenis?
Between 7 and 10 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Lysimelia lenis sightings with a recorded time, and about half of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is seen both by day and at night.
Is Blue Mountains National Park the best place to see a Lysimelia lenis?
2nd of 2
Of the 2 parks where we can rate Lysimelia lenis sightings, Blue Mountains National Park ranks 2nd at under 5%. The best odds are in Lamington National Park (Australia, about 10%).
Which relatives of the Lysimelia lenis live in Blue Mountains National Park?
Same family: Erebidae
The closest relatives of the Lysimelia lenis that you can see in Blue Mountains National Park (family Erebidae, Underwing, Tiger, Tussock, and Allied Moths) are Light Ermine Moth (about 10%), Bird Dropping Lichen Moth (about 10%) and Tigrioides alterna (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Lysimelia lenis sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Lysimelia lenis is recorded against all the insects logged in Blue Mountains National Park (5 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.