Meranda susialis
In 3 days ~30% in a week ~50%
Meranda susialis is a moth of the family Noctuidae first described by Francis Walker in 1859. It is known from Australia. Wikipedia →
| # | Park | Country | Daily sighting probability |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blue Mountains National Park | 🇦🇺 Australia | |
| 2 | Lamington National Park | 🇦🇺 Australia |
| # | City | Country | Daily sighting probability |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Brisbane | 🇦🇺 Australia |
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Three-Lined Snout sighting in Blue Mountains National Park on a given day, based on 32 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 122nd most-seen of the 789 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 30%, and over a week to about 50%, if each day is a fresh chance.
October to March
In those months about 10% of wildlife watchers report a Three-Lined Snout in Blue Mountains National Park on a given day, against under 5% in April to September, the lowest months.
Between 7 and 10 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Three-Lined Snout sightings with a recorded time, and about 7 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Yes
Of the 2 parks where we can rate Three-Lined Snout sightings, Blue Mountains National Park has the highest daily chance: about 10%. Next come Lamington National Park (Australia, about 10%).
Same family: Erebidae
The closest relatives of the Three-Lined Snout that you can see in Blue Mountains National Park (family Erebidae, Underwing, Tiger, Tussock, and Allied Moths) are Light Ermine Moth (about 10%), Bird Dropping Lichen Moth (about 10%) and Tigrioides alterna (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Three-Lined Snout is recorded against all the insects logged in Blue Mountains National Park (32 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.
