Dioptis longipennis
In 3 days ~20% in a week ~40%
Dioptis longipennis is a moth of the family Notodontidae first described by William Schaus in 1913. It is found in Costa Rica, Panama and Nicaragua. The larvae feed on Asterogyne, Calyptrogyne, Geonoma and Prestoea species. Wikipedia →
| # | Park | Country | Daily sighting probability |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Braulio Carrillo National Park | 🇨🇷 Costa Rica |
More parks will be added in future updates.
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Dioptis longipennis sighting in Braulio Carrillo National Park on a given day, based on 10 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 196th most-seen of the 378 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 20%, and over a week to about 40%, if each day is a fresh chance.
January–March and June–July
In those months about 10% of wildlife watchers report a Dioptis longipennis in Braulio Carrillo National Park on a given day, against under 5% in April–May and August–December, the lowest months.
Between 9 am and noon
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Dioptis longipennis sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Only Braulio Carrillo National Park, in our data
Braulio Carrillo National Park is the only park on Wallace's Line with enough records to rate Dioptis longipennis sightings: about 10% of wildlife watchers there report one on a given day.
Same family: Notodontidae
The closest relatives of the Dioptis longipennis that you can see in Braulio Carrillo National Park (family Notodontidae, Prominent Moths) are Tithraustes noctiluces (about 10%), Isostyla zetila (about 10%) and Pseudantiora contingata (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Dioptis longipennis is recorded against all the insects logged in Braulio Carrillo National Park (10 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.
